Appalachian State
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
224  Tristin Van Ord SR 20:22
795  Emily Fedders SO 21:18
899  Torre Moser SR 21:26
1,066  Hana Ratcliffe JR 21:36
1,120  Natalie Kile SR 21:40
1,152  Phylissa Greeley JR 21:42
1,252  Kerry Leonard JR 21:47
1,523  Elisa Sargent SO 22:05
1,568  Erin Jameson SO 22:07
1,873  Sarah Venable FR 22:26
1,965  Kate Butler SO 22:31
2,011  Megan Scannell FR 22:33
2,360  Leigh Harrow JR 22:58
2,368  Sarah Hoffert SO 22:59
2,592  Molly Pusateri SO 23:19
2,772  Alison Peters JR 23:38
2,815  Natalie Richardson FR 23:46
2,969  Ellen Spencer FR 24:09
National Rank #111 of 344
Southeast Region Rank #17 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 17th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.1%
Top 10 in Regional 2.8%
Top 20 in Regional 98.8%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Tristin Van Ord Emily Fedders Torre Moser Hana Ratcliffe Natalie Kile Phylissa Greeley Kerry Leonard Elisa Sargent Erin Jameson Sarah Venable Kate Butler
Mountains to Sea Duals 09/16 1145 20:45 21:16 21:34 21:34 21:34 21:43 22:01 22:44 22:18 22:42
Panorama Farms Invitational 09/23 1077 20:22 21:23 21:13 21:41 22:20 21:29 21:27 22:06
High Point Vert Invitational 10/14 1101 20:32 21:12 21:36 21:30 21:26 21:25 21:42 21:59 22:00 22:39 22:29
Sun Belt Conference 10/29 1048 20:14 21:07 21:21 21:24 21:30 21:42
Southeast Region Champioinships 11/11 1077 20:12 21:11 21:48 22:22 21:50 21:56 22:10





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 15.7 430 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.6 2.7 5.5 8.9 12.6 12.5 13.9 15.5 12.1 7.6 5.0 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tristin Van Ord 0.8% 131.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Tristin Van Ord 24.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.7 1.9 1.7 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.9 4.5 3.4 4.6 3.9 3.8 4.2 4.4 3.9
Emily Fedders 84.0 0.1
Torre Moser 97.9
Hana Ratcliffe 115.3
Natalie Kile 122.0
Phylissa Greeley 125.5
Kerry Leonard 133.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.1% 0.1 5
6 0.1% 0.1 6
7 0.3% 0.3 7
8 0.4% 0.4 8
9 0.5% 0.5 9
10 1.6% 1.6 10
11 2.7% 2.7 11
12 5.5% 5.5 12
13 8.9% 8.9 13
14 12.6% 12.6 14
15 12.5% 12.5 15
16 13.9% 13.9 16
17 15.5% 15.5 17
18 12.1% 12.1 18
19 7.6% 7.6 19
20 5.0% 5.0 20
21 0.8% 0.8 21
22 0.3% 0.3 22
23 0.2% 0.2 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0